<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>mrshl blog - Latest Comments in links for 2007-11-06</title><link>http://mrshlblog.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 08:30:43 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: links for 2007-11-06</title><link>http://mrshl.net/links-for-2007-11-06/#comment-2997234</link><description>320 or 160: i cannot tell the difference. my dumb ears are fine with whatever compression is available north of 128.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;i paid $4. money well spent.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mrshl</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 08:30:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: links for 2007-11-06</title><link>http://mrshl.net/links-for-2007-11-06/#comment-2997233</link><description>I'm rather happy that I paid nothing for the Radiohead album for the following two reasons:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1.  It only comes in a 160 bitrate format, which is not up to snuff.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2.  The actual album will include a lot more songs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've read in several places that this "revolutionary new approach to music vending" is actually more of a marketing technique, since the online product is crippled and incomplete.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That said, my free download is rocking my socks off, yet I feel no guilt.  Perhaps it's the $30 I paid for my Radiohead t-shirt on the OK Computer tour.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dactylmat</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 06:24:54 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>