<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>mrshl blog - Latest Comments in Joe Lieberman and Democrats are breaking up?</title><link>http://mrshlblog.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 12:00:25 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Joe Lieberman and Democrats are breaking up?</title><link>http://mrshl.net/joe-lieberman-and-democrats-are-breaking-up/#comment-2183654</link><description>No, no. Libertarians are relatively dogmatic in their belief that government&lt;br&gt;should have almost no regulatory role in the lives of its citizens. I don't&lt;br&gt;believe that at all. I do believe in paying our bills with sensible taxes&lt;br&gt;and sensible spending. I also believe the federal government should&lt;br&gt;generally abstain from regulating the sex lives of consenting adults. Where&lt;br&gt;I differ with libertarians is my belief that some federal regulation is&lt;br&gt;required in the financial, environmental, and healthcare sections of the&lt;br&gt;American economy. I am a man in the middle, my friend.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mrshl</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 12:00:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Joe Lieberman and Democrats are breaking up?</title><link>http://mrshl.net/joe-lieberman-and-democrats-are-breaking-up/#comment-2183485</link><description>&amp;gt;if more conservatives became socially liberal or if more democrats became &lt;br&gt;&amp;gt; fiscally conservative, I might have someone I could vote for.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So that means you're a libertarian.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joel reed parker</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 11:37:26 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>